This is page 9 of the most recent comments throughout all of Vazaar. Whenever a new comment is added to a photo it will appear at the top of the first page. Older conversations drop lower into the following pages.

by JBridges
7 comments
lbstone (Brandon Stone) added a critique 10 days ago:
JBridges (Jim Bridges) said 10 days ago:
When I posted this on my photoblog, I also got a comment about the flares of light at the top... and I think the best advice--which I handily forgot to heed before posting this here--was to crop out the two smaller blobs of light at the very top, but leave the larger one. I think it needs the light, but I think the answer is between leaving it as is and cropping it out entirely.
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 10 days ago:
Leave it alone, it's very nice the way it is!! My only comment is that it's a little soft overall.
AmberDawn (Amber Sullivan) added a critique 3 days ago:
That was my thought when I first saw it - crop out the top light and leave the rounder one and then I would maybe crop out the very bottom fish too. Nice!
elaine (elaine vallet) added a critique 3 days ago:
well, if i were to crop something, i would crop the bottom fish... I love the light where it is :)

by meditant
4 comments
sfkp (Tamara) said 4 days ago:
I really love this photo, it shows this is certainly the work of a specialist!
But... it isn't really 'nude', don't you think?
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 3 days ago:
Would go well in "High key", sad to say she is not nude...
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 3 days ago:
Oh, BTW, very nice image, great tones, well done.
meditant (Franck RONDOT) said 3 days ago:
Thanks for the comments, sorry for the topics. sexy <> nude.

by snaps
6 comments
blossompp3 added a critique 20 days ago:
Beautiful flower. The lighting on the right is a little harsh and causing you to lose some detail.
boyd added a critique 15 days ago:
This is a very interesting subject, but I agree with blossompp3 that the highlights on the right are a little blown. The detail you have captured on the main section of the flower are very nicely exposed and have pleasing tones.
narnold (Noah Arnold) added a critique 7 days ago:
I really like the texture of this photo, can't add anything else that hasn't already been said! Great job!
AmberDawn (Amber Sullivan) added a critique 3 days ago:
What an interesting plant. A shade of some sort for the sun on the right would have been helpful as the others have said. What kind of plant is it? I have never seen that before!
snaps (Dana N) said 3 days ago:
Thanks AD. It's actually a baby banana plant/tree, and those are baby bananas ;)

by cezarl
1 comment
elaine (elaine vallet) said 3 days ago:
a very good processing and compo! i like the tones!

by gerryfoto
1 comment

by byutanner
11 comments
ScottCrouse (Scott Crouse) said 4 days ago:
Thanks for the info Jason. The new photoshop does a pretty good job stitching, that I have noticed. I have the same camera and lens and have found the lens distortion at 18mm sometimes a bit tough for PS to handle but it's a good lens. Thanks mate!
byutanner (Jason Tanner) said 4 days ago:
HuubL - yeah definitely very similar. Good shot.
Scott - Yeah I agree. If I were to shoot it again I think I'd use the 18-70mm and zoom in a little more. It'd take more images, but there would be less distortion.
Thanks all again.
taikrixel (thomas mueller) said 4 days ago:
stunning shot. great composition with the two trees and i like the wonderful nature, you'd captured.
brilliant!
killsamz (bizet samuel) said 3 days ago:
nice panoramic shot !
in HDR?
godd job!!
byutanner (Jason Tanner) said 3 days ago:
Thanks everyone And killsamz, its actually not HDR. Just a regular shot :)

by Nomade
2 comments

by mizztech
3 comments
Pixim (Eric) said 7 months ago:
I like the point of view, and how the conditions of the day are returned. Greetings.
Labem (Maxim Labem) said 7 months ago:
nice (the light, the compo, the minimal style, the symbolism). ml
sunside (Markus Mayer) said 3 days ago:
I absolutely second that. Awesome shot!

by augusto
1 comment
sunside (Markus Mayer) said 3 days ago:
I like this one, but I think I would have preferred a somewhat lower perspective, closer to the footsteeps and looking up to the horizon. (Of course I wasn't there so I can't tell if that really would have been better. :))

by riesenriel
12 comments
Sher (Sher Hilliard) added a critique 11 months ago:
I disagree with the above. The topic is Beach not person. I think the mystery surrounding the person works well. I like it as is. Wonderful work.
cutebutstupid (Amy Baxter) added a critique 11 months ago:
I actually agree with Sher on this one. Although I do wonder what a straight b/w would like. Wonderful idea!
jcniguez (José Carlos Ñíguez) added a critique 10 months ago:
Una fotografía con encanto. El viraje a sepia-rosaceo, un gran acierto. Encuadre, contraste, profundidad de campo y saturación muy buenos; solamente y coincido con Jeff en que se podría haber aclararado la silueta de la figura humana y definirla más. ¡Enhorabuena!
ikol22 (Fabrizio Zanelli) added a critique 10 months ago:
Cool !!! I'm happy it has been featured.
sunside (Markus Mayer) added a critique 3 days ago:
I really don't see much to improve here. One thing could be the shadows. I'd probably light that guy up just a little bit so that a little more detail is visible, but it would be really a fine tweak. I'm not sure what that thing is that hangs there on the third bar, but when I think about it, the photo would lose something if that would have been removed.
Really, that's a great shot!
I really like the light. If it was cropped out, the image would have less impact, imho.