This image has been removed from all topics!
Uploaded by jvgphoto - 3 comments
Copyright © jvgphoto (jon van gilder)
- www.jvgphoto.com
Unauthorized reproduction not permitted.
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) said 1 month ago:
sfkp (Tamara) said 1 month ago:
Well, did you know Monet actual painted what he could really see? Descendants of Monet appear to have a genetical eye-desease. Monet's vision was very blurry, that's the reason he painted like that.
So... if you call this a copy of Monet's work, you should going to an eye-doctor :)
I like the effect, 'crap'is not the first thing that flows in my mind. I actual kind a like it, but no, I don't want a copy of it on the wall and I don't have to see lots of these on Vazaar either. :) It's something diffrent.
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 1 month ago:
Very nice Jon, I like it, very nice pastel, abstract feel. I fool around with this type of stuff sometimes:
www.vazaar.com/user:Beamer/photos/id:22228/
www.vazaar.com/user:Beamer/photos/id:14013/
You could comment on this photo if you were logged in.
Straight from the camera - f22 and long exposure with lots of intentional shake, rattle and roll. Does anyone like this kind of thing? Or is it basically just crap? A kind of instant impressionist copy of Monet...or is it Manet? Just kidding:-)
Best,
Jon